MODS make a 2x2 cba hero tourney. civs like infantry+range, example. china+ celt / japan+mayans/ aztecs+japan/ or monogols+mayans. or any thank u.HOPE TO BE

stfu

look at your sig, proud of being '#1' on a client full of people with downs. ****.

**** see what is thread **** noob

GB FAT ****

will be better 2v2 mirror civs i think who is better idea

need fixed civs brother;nonono

+1 voobly need cba hero tourney

You mad Ali baba?

Ehhhh 1v1 mirror would be better well from my point

some things primez star

1. you make claims you're the best player of all time, first things first, you're playing at a time where most people in the time aoc has been out have quit....

2. therefore you cannot compare yourself vs them

3. you only actually play cba hero/cba, that is a tiny fraction of CS let alone aoc, there are about 20 well known/played bloods, popular ones inc smosh, vet, gwarz, germs, path, km, khans, archers, spider, rad, grave, dome etc..... there are complex cb's such as mini/cbf and mcb, there are alt maps inc europe, dodgeball etc... to say say you're even top 50 of CS , top 50, you have to play a range, which you do not, to say you're even top 500 of AoC means you're a high level pro at rm, dm all maps and a range of cs maps..

4. within cba hero/cba you have to consider ffa/tg/same civ and rdm/1v1/2v2s also.... your skill is an average of how well you cope in all situations

5. even if you limit it down to just your 1v1 skills, you only ONLY play infantry, infantry civs are patrol, use runners, patrol, use runners, patrol, use runners, with reinforcements and making sure your units dont get distracted by changing stances, it's not hard

6. you refuse to play other civs, so every 1v1 player who plays a range of civs ie. which require a different skill set (ie. celts, byz, franks, spanish, mongol, saracen, brit & maya) , every 1v1 player who plays that kind of range is instantly better than you, in 1v1, let alone overall

7. the level for cba/hero 1v1 players is low atm due to inactivity of older, more experienced, technical famous players. examples inc (in cba/hero 1v1) damian, geen, zanchy, brian, master g, final, fujative... the list goes on..... even if you have beaten some of these players, you must ask, do you beat them when they're at their best, active, non camping? at which maps? just cba/hero? both? all maps? do you honestly beat them at the range of civs... ? probably 99.999999999999% not

my point being......... you're actually a nobody in CS, Voobly and AoC......... its not a good thing, its not a bad thing, its just a game... but if you are going to have an ego and call yourself the best bla bla bla **** back it up, ive just destroyed your comment.

u hate me because i have raped u many times before ur any other accnts ****. and stfu dont care me how i play or what i play. because i playing for my entertaiment ****. u not pay for me ****. so go GTFO get a life ****. u just a kind of a scyo @ aoc ****. dont crosse me ****. gtfo **** gay. i play which i like. if i like ur **************************** i do else i move on. u understand?? **************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** u some of a ************************
***** **** gtfo from me **** dont care my game ************

^ Hilarious. Literacy for the win.

Who is this noob clown?

see title of this thread and see replays of ****s . this why all players leaving

"See the* title of this thread* and* see the replies* of these* ****s" is the correct grammar to use I believe.

In any case, the reply I was expecting of an un-educated, egotistic, lying, childish player of whom has a fake rate and is highly insecure of him/herself in both aoc and real life.