im the guy who has more played lustful games here so noone cant say i'm wrong since i got exp and decent level as my actions showed in TG games, the only one who can actually tell me i'm wrong is crack and andy but there's no way they'll since they know im not lying, so
Nice try javi, also how can you call anybody cringe when you just made a post proclaiming yourself the commissioner of all things lustful lmfao!! "noone can tell me ****" fk me i'm lol'ing hard
Was the game 100% won for Dy? No, but they did have a significant advantage, and king kept dropping. VCOM guidelines are clear that if someone drops (especially the amount of times king dropped - not sure why he claims it was once when 30 specs all saw it multiple times) then the other team is granted the winner if they have an advantage. Even if you don't think it was won, it's pretty hard to argue Dy didn't have a pretty significant advantage.
Out of every TIW set i've watched, this was by far the least enjoyable and most painful to spec because of kings constant dropping and behaviour... and he still continues to be insufferable. It appears he thinks he's the authority on what the score is and his say is final
I proclaim myself since my actions spoken that way, amd gary its just my opinion has someone who has thousands of lustful matches
It's a logical fallacy, which i outlined above just incase you missed it first time little man.
The fact you've played tons of lustful games does not make your opinion gospel, and it especially doesn't remove the bias you have with IC (we all know about your 'plan' with regards to points and IC, it's hilarious - let me know how that works out brainbox). You can't simply proclaim yourself the authority on lustful just because you've played it a lot, especially when you have a CLEAR conflict of interest.
Honestly, i'm kind of embarrassed for you that you actually wrote that and hit the post button lmfao.
I agree with jv though, having mid control with siege is often better than having more villagers but no mid control. Dy had An advantage i think, but the game was in no way over imo.
(But does that even matter at all?)
I agree with jv though, having mid control with siege is often better than having more villagers but no mid control. Dy had An advantage i think, but the game was in no way over imo.
(But does that even matter at all?)
Honestly, it's probably true and i'm not saying he's wrong. I'm saying he can't proclaim himself the god of all things lustful and 'nobody can tell him ****'
I think we (as in most people posting) mostly agree on these facts:
1. The game was not over
2. Dy did have a decent advantage
Personally, i think Dy should be given the win based on the fact dy had an advantage and king was consistently dropping throughout most of the set. King is acting innocent, but by the time it was going to be replayed (again), the set had dragged on so long most of Dys members couldn't stay, so it's impossible to restore.
But its up to army to take these factors into account and come to a decision i guess.
Honestly, it's probably true and i'm not saying he's wrong. I'm saying he can't proclaim himself the god of all things lustful and 'nobody can tell him ****'
I think we (as in most people posting) mostly agree on these facts:
1. The game was not over
2. Dy did have a pretty decent advantage though
Personally, i think Dy should be given the win based on the fact dy had an advantage and king was consistently dropping throughout most of the set.
But its up to army to take these factors into account and come to a decision i guess.
¨
i haven't proclamed myself the god and as I said, other experienced players such as Andy or Crack (who is also Dy) can't deny what i'm saying since they know its true.
So if the game was not over and even king after always comming back why didnt they just finish the game?
i haven't proclamed myself the god and as I said, other experienced players such as Andy or Crack (who is also Dy) can't deny what i'm saying since they know its true.
So if the game was not over and even king after always comming back why didnt they just finish the game?
Because king dropped multiple times, they decided to play other maps that king wasn't in, and when king tried to force a replay, the set had dragged on so long due to the drops and the drops in the dodgeball game, crak had left.
Do you think it's reasonable to expect a team to play an entire set and the other team to be able to drop as much as they like without consequence? There has to be a line drawn with drops somewhere.
I think we (as in most people posting) mostly agree on these facts:
1. The game was not over
2. Dy did have a pretty decent advantage though
Personally, i think Dy should be given the win based on the fact dy had an advantage and king was consistently dropping throughout most of the set.
But its up to army to take these factors into account and come to a decision i guess.
Yea exactly.
Its up to army now to make a decision, but IT wont really matter anyway in the end (its very unlikely to make a difference).
Can we all try to stop pressuring army btw? 11
5 vills vs 2
2 fully built tcs vs 0 (demo just put himself in a corner of the map starting a tc so he'd be without any buildings except for a few on the middle he had already)
13 docks vs 10 (6 of IC's docks were from machesano who had 0 vills and 7/5 pop during the time of the drop)
Also they had way more presence on the outside and units. You guys are acting like IC had 20 mangonels on the middle.. they had like 4 or 5 and Efkan had around 20 war galleys that can pick those off easily.
Game was over & Dropping rules state already that Dy won the match regardless.
Having just watched the rec, it was pretty much over honestly. 5 vills vs 2, 2 tcs vs 0, and as sean said 6 of IC's docks were mascheranos who had 7/5 pop and no vills.
I'd urge others to watch it before commenting, watching the game live it did seem kind of close and i thought it was closer, but it seems like the drop happened pretty much at the tipping point of the game.
?
You guys make the game un-enjoyable. Stop ffs.
Nice try javi, also how can you call anybody cringe when you just made a post proclaiming yourself the commissioner of all things lustful lmfao!! "noone can tell me ****" fk me i'm lol'ing hard
Was the game 100% won for Dy? No, but they did have a significant advantage, and king kept dropping. VCOM guidelines are clear that if someone drops (especially the amount of times king dropped - not sure why he claims it was once when 30 specs all saw it multiple times) then the other team is granted the winner if they have an advantage. Even if you don't think it was won, it's pretty hard to argue Dy didn't have a pretty significant advantage.
Out of every TIW set i've watched, this was by far the least enjoyable and most painful to spec because of kings constant dropping and behaviour... and he still continues to be insufferable. It appears he thinks he's the authority on what the score is and his say is final
The fact you've played tons of lustful games does not make your opinion gospel, and it especially doesn't remove the bias you have with IC (we all know about your 'plan' with regards to points and IC, it's hilarious - let me know how that works out brainbox). You can't simply proclaim yourself the authority on lustful just because you've played it a lot, especially when you have a CLEAR conflict of interest.
Honestly, i'm kind of embarrassed for you that you actually wrote that and hit the post button lmfao.
(But does that even matter at all?)
(But does that even matter at all?)
I think we (as in most people posting) mostly agree on these facts:
1. The game was not over
2. Dy did have a decent advantage
Personally, i think Dy should be given the win based on the fact dy had an advantage and king was consistently dropping throughout most of the set. King is acting innocent, but by the time it was going to be replayed (again), the set had dragged on so long most of Dys members couldn't stay, so it's impossible to restore.
But its up to army to take these factors into account and come to a decision i guess.
I think we (as in most people posting) mostly agree on these facts:
1. The game was not over
2. Dy did have a pretty decent advantage though
Personally, i think Dy should be given the win based on the fact dy had an advantage and king was consistently dropping throughout most of the set.
But its up to army to take these factors into account and come to a decision i guess.
i haven't proclamed myself the god and as I said, other experienced players such as Andy or Crack (who is also Dy) can't deny what i'm saying since they know its true.
So if the game was not over and even king after always comming back why didnt they just finish the game?
i haven't proclamed myself the god and as I said, other experienced players such as Andy or Crack (who is also Dy) can't deny what i'm saying since they know its true.
So if the game was not over and even king after always comming back why didnt they just finish the game?
Do you think it's reasonable to expect a team to play an entire set and the other team to be able to drop as much as they like without consequence? There has to be a line drawn with drops somewhere.
I think we (as in most people posting) mostly agree on these facts:
1. The game was not over
2. Dy did have a pretty decent advantage though
Personally, i think Dy should be given the win based on the fact dy had an advantage and king was consistently dropping throughout most of the set.
But its up to army to take these factors into account and come to a decision i guess.
Yea exactly.
Its up to army now to make a decision, but IT wont really matter anyway in the end (its very unlikely to make a difference).
Can we all try to stop pressuring army btw? 11
5 vills vs 2
2 fully built tcs vs 0 (demo just put himself in a corner of the map starting a tc so he'd be without any buildings except for a few on the middle he had already)
13 docks vs 10 (6 of IC's docks were from machesano who had 0 vills and 7/5 pop during the time of the drop)
Also they had way more presence on the outside and units. You guys are acting like IC had 20 mangonels on the middle.. they had like 4 or 5 and Efkan had around 20 war galleys that can pick those off easily.
Game was over & Dropping rules state already that Dy won the match regardless.
I'd urge others to watch it before commenting, watching the game live it did seem kind of close and i thought it was closer, but it seems like the drop happened pretty much at the tipping point of the game.