Yeah that's not right in my opinion. If you are hosting league games then you cannot ignore other people who are not banned. You're having 14xx play instead of competent players and that's not in the spirit of the league.
If anyone is hosting a league game then you need to prioritize having league members play over non league members. If there are more than 8 then the highest rating player should play.
On teaming:
It's ffa first of all. If you are the first to get something like middle/theo/harald/double khan etc or pose a risk to all players you can expect to get teamed. It's in the other 7 players best interest to not let someone free mid etc.
What is not allowed is pre arranged alliances between players to kill others outside of the group first.
Not attacking certain players is the same as teaming against certain players.
If you feel like someone is breaking the teaming rule show me a pattern of games (3+ games) depending on how many total games they have played. You can't just cherry pick 3 games out of 30 where they killed a certain player first.
On ruining games:
This doesn't mean your individual game was ruined, but the entire game as a whole. For example if someone is purposefully feeding someone to gain an unfair advantage.
There's a lot of ways to win ffa you don't always have to attack the first place player sometimes it's better to let two other people fight then strike when they are both weaker.
If someone is just food for a stronger enemy it's in your best interest to eliminate their food.
Countless different situations and people will react differently so keep that in mind before you claim a game was "ruined".
On players who drop:
Common practice in ffa is not to save games when someone drops. Nobody knows if that player is going to be able to return to restore. If you guys can make some kind of gentleman's agreement to save then go for it, but I won't enforce a save rule.
I've made it so players receive a minimum amount of food/wood to offset some of the damage you receive to your trade profit score.
I think these rules are both fair and common sense.
i report P5 for intentional feeding see k/d ratio
i report Adan For play For RUIN!.. he purchased 3 trebs, killed and resing. he not buy hero or nathing he just played for ruin
He's a coward unwilling to let me in his games. There should be a rule against that. Player base is small enough as is.
Damn cowards around here.
This is weapon btw. I made a new name now that I'm getting more used to playing again.
Again, damn kids lol.
He's a coward unwilling to let me in his games. There should be a rule against that. Player base is small enough as is.
Damn cowards around here.
This is weapon btw. I made a new name now that I'm getting more used to playing again.
Again, damn kids lol.
+1
He is hosting games 24/7 and ignoring everyone that will not team him. Just lol.
I wonder how hard it is to win a tournament where you decide who plays, who doesn't, which player can attack which player, etc.
He is hosting games 24/7 and ignoring everyone that will not team him. Just lol.
I wonder how hard it is to win a tournament where you decide who plays, who doesn't, which player can attack which player, etc.
Donnie?
If anyone is hosting a league game then you need to prioritize having league members play over non league members. If there are more than 8 then the highest rating player should play.
On teaming:
It's ffa first of all. If you are the first to get something like middle/theo/harald/double khan etc or pose a risk to all players you can expect to get teamed. It's in the other 7 players best interest to not let someone free mid etc.
What is not allowed is pre arranged alliances between players to kill others outside of the group first.
Not attacking certain players is the same as teaming against certain players.
If you feel like someone is breaking the teaming rule show me a pattern of games (3+ games) depending on how many total games they have played. You can't just cherry pick 3 games out of 30 where they killed a certain player first.
On ruining games:
This doesn't mean your individual game was ruined, but the entire game as a whole. For example if someone is purposefully feeding someone to gain an unfair advantage.
There's a lot of ways to win ffa you don't always have to attack the first place player sometimes it's better to let two other people fight then strike when they are both weaker.
If someone is just food for a stronger enemy it's in your best interest to eliminate their food.
Countless different situations and people will react differently so keep that in mind before you claim a game was "ruined".
On players who drop:
Common practice in ffa is not to save games when someone drops. Nobody knows if that player is going to be able to return to restore. If you guys can make some kind of gentleman's agreement to save then go for it, but I won't enforce a save rule.
I've made it so players receive a minimum amount of food/wood to offset some of the damage you receive to your trade profit score.
I think these rules are both fair and common sense.
https://www.voobly.com/match/view/24814530
https://www.voobly.com/match/view/24814530
00:46:09 [7th]AwakeNg: 7
00:46:13 [7th]AwakeNg: p8 harlds
00:50:20 [7th]AwakeNg: p8 harld lol
00:59:20 [7th]AwakeNg: p6 mid
01:02:11 labandota: 11
01:02:26 labandota: que puerco diego
01:03:20 labandota: harald
01:11:37 labandota advanced to Imperial Age
01:14:56 labandota: 11
01:22:18 [7th]AwakeNg: p6 global
01:29:31 [7th]AwakeNg: 11
I’m sure it is hard to kill someone rated 1381. Want some help m8?
https://www.voobly.com/match/view/24814530
adnan the donator of tourney call me to play go blame him ,i havnt post the win tho