1 User(s) are reading this topic (in the past 30 minutes)
0 members, 1 guests
0 members, 1 guests
What's popular right now:








AoKTS updates (62 users)

Word Association (54 users)

CBA PathBlood 1.8.2 (29 users)

1.6 reward campaing (27 users)

New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (21 users)

TIW 2020 Map votes (16 users)

New Voobly Client 2.7 (16 users)
Most active threads in past week:








Strange bug (6 posts)

THis record just pauses and im u... (5 posts)

Unable to spec 1.6 game data games (4 posts)

a problem in download (4 posts)

Nobody can play 1.6 anymore. (4 posts)

1.6 out of sync without player d... (4 posts)

Elite skins for 1.6 (3 posts)
Hola a todos, había dejado este juego hace tiempo; en aquellos tiempos estaban grandes jugadores en 1vs1 (con su civilización) como geenberry,wallabis, estigma, etc.. y por no mencionar a los demás; ahora que regreso veo un nivel mas alto en los juegos 4vs4 en los mapas como cba , RCB, Castle bloods y algunos bloods. Esta generación actual de jugadores para mi es excelente, sin embargo tengo que mencionar que el voobly se esta decayendo cada vez más en los juegos 1vs1 same civilizacion, en realidad no se porque pase esto, creo que es por que hoy en día son muy pocos los jugadores con verdadero nivel, lo que es verdad es que en las salas se juega mas 1vs1 random civilizacion.
Por otra parte quiero también hacer mención del rated general, no entiendo porque lo quitaron ya que para algunos jugadores era importante, era una inspiración por seguir creciendo en puntos y te llevaba a aumentar el nivel de juego. Ojala pudieran someter de nuevo a votacion el Rated en general.
English: (Google traductor)
Hi all, I had left this game long ago; at that time great players in 1vs1 (with its civilization) as geenberry, wallabies, stigma, etc. .. and not to mention the others were; I see now that return a higher level in the 4vs4 games on maps as cba, RCB, Castle and some bloods bloods. This current generation of players for me is excellent, however I have to mention that the Voobly is this decline increasingly in games 1vs1 same civilization, actually not because through this, I think is that today very few true level players, what is true is that most rooms playing 1v1 random civilization.
On the other hand I also want to mention the overall rated, do not understand why they took it off because for some players it was important, it was an inspiration to continue growing in points and took you to increase the level of play. I wish they could refer back to the Rated voting in general.
Thats why.
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111
I did giggle when he said estigma, wallabis and geen were experts tho
111111111111111111111111111111111111
i wasnt laughing, i was saying "yesyesyesyesyesyesyesyes"
I did giggle when he said estigma, wallabis and geen were experts tho
I don't see why you wouldn't consider Geen an expert, he was a level above everyone else while you were still in diapers over at Gamespy. Then again, I guess you've only seen the newschool generation of CBA players.
i wasnt laughing, i was saying "yesyesyesyesyesyesyesyes"
No1 care about 1v1 - How its fun to patrol 80 men ? Its too easy to learn and i think its for younger lads.
Better all learn 4v4 random civs. 1v1 isnt for Custom Scenario also Same civs isnt for custom scenario. Its all about 4v4 random games. Played with 1v1 and 2v2 players and i can tell they really suck in TG's.
Better all learn 4v4 random civs. 1v1 isnt for Custom Scenario also Same civs isnt for custom scenario. Its all about 4v4 random games. Played with 1v1 and 2v2 players and i can tell they really suck in TG's.