Community Forums > Voobly Community > Age of Empires II: The Conquerors > Custom Scenario > Rated Map Pack / Ladders and official CS news > Polls, and General discuss > Suggestion Hero Fest
8 User(s) are reading this topic (in the past 30 minutes)
0 members, 8 guests
0 members, 8 guests
O que é popular agora:
Word Association (101 usuários)
€100 OPEN Challenge - CBA HERO (19 usuários)
AoKTS updates (18 usuários)
Top 5 players of all time (R6) (17 usuários)
#ReviveCS - Proposal (16 usuários)
TDII (14 usuários)
TIW 2020 Map votes (13 usuários)
Os tópicos mais ativos da última semana:
#ReviveCS - Proposal (42 mensagens)
1.0c shows in game instead of 1.... (10 mensagens)
Voobly disappearing without erro... (9 mensagens)
New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (7 mensagens)
Error al lanzar la partida (6 mensagens)
my version shows as 1.0C and oth... (4 mensagens)
1.6 Out of sync without any play... (4 mensagens)
You have answered all of my questions and more. Ty.
You didn't 'just ask him to 'liat' points why map 'ist' suitable for 4v4'.
This is how you ask for someone to elaborate on their opinion:
"Could you please explain why you think this"?
Instead of 'ur opinion doesn't mean anything becuz ur a newb at most maps wahhh'
11 ok man. Honestly you could have written 3 books by now and have a good life on the bahamas instead of commenting every fking post that doesnt even involve u. Whats the problem i sell sex toys and have a couple other onlineshops and startups. Feel free to ask if you need help on anything
They trial scars product for him.
yes Huge black horse d1cks on Stock
[You must login to view link]
Give all civs Bracer (& siege engineers)
Give all civs Siege Rams
Give all non bbt civs Paladins
Give all civs except Spanish Treadmill Cane
Bracer/Siege Engineers needed for fairness
Siege rams gives non bbt civs the opportunity to fight aggressively early on. I think bbt civs should also get siege rams (Teutons, Koreans) so they too have the option to fight aggressively against bbt civs so all civs should get siege rams
Civs like Brits, Mayans, Aztecs, Goths, Japs etc have nothing going for them even with Britons, Goths, Japs getting siege rams. They too should get Paladins so they can push with Paladins + Rams like other civs (Huns). However I don't think all civs should get Pala since the BBT civs already have a lot going for them - with paladins they could do a pala+ram push and bbt spam the space gained.
Treadmill Cane for fairness
I'm not very good at HF so I could be very wrong
I also agree with Barry but some changes to make Mesoamerican civs, Brits, Goths etc stronger couldn't hurt
They trial scars product for him.
This ROFL
Add it to 1v1, 2v2 sure its ok. The map style does not mesh with 4v4 especially with random spots. If someone is in the middle of 4 there is nothing to be done. as they will be surrounded in seconds.
Add it to 1v1, 2v2 sure its ok. The map style does not mesh with 4v4 especially with random spots. If someone is in the middle of 4 there is nothing to be done. as they will be surrounded in seconds.
The worst bit is that if that player dies then their team likely wins due to excess feed.
Its not a good map for TG.
Also KM was removed from random for this reason. You can survive a 2v1 khans unless damian is playing with his tower mod. Germs was removed for this and other reasons and I'm trying to fix its flaws. Gwarz/Drow were removed by me prompting my access to the mod to be removed due to biased admins. WoA is fine. RCB isn't so bad. Vets is winnable from bad spots. Rad is ****. AoW is trash.