1 User(s) are reading this topic (in the past 30 minutes)
0 members, 1 guests
0 members, 1 guests
What's popular right now:
Word Association (52 users)
1.6 reward campaing (32 users)
AoKTS updates (32 users)
🌟 Let's Restart Custom Scenar... (21 users)
CBA PathBlood 1.8.0 (14 users)
TIW 2020 Map votes (12 users)
Forgotten Empires 2.2 for Age of... (11 users)
Most active threads in past week:
Restore Problem (12 posts)
If there is chance to advertise ... (8 posts)
AOM Error "Unsupported Grap... (8 posts)
Torneo 1v1 HUMAITA / HUMAITA 1... (8 posts)
Which AI can play DE Islands cus... (7 posts)
Old VCOM/Tournament forums (6 posts)
🌟 Let's Restart Custom Scenar... (5 posts)
Alors ESO est de loin le meilleurs systeme car il permet de crée une liste de Hackers.
voobly n'est pas un bon systeme.
I believe there are several topics about this on RTS Sanc site and everyone want ESO rating system implemented here.
Also, there should be a counter on total number of games played, rated or unrated.
That would be SUPER cool!
@golden: that's not simple to do since we use LAN games to play.
If playing vs a player 100 points below gives you 4 pts for win and 40 for lose (?) isnt it obvious that it is a BAD rating system? This would make games at higher levels especially ridiculous. 2200 vs 2100 what a big difference
[LPT]Good, you're a noob!
Wait, till you see the the rating system for AoE HD, which will be like AoT ESO rating system, everyone from Voobly AoC will leave Voobly because they'll like AoE HD rating system.