as a final statement to cater to CBs a bit more.. I think the best way to do map voting would be
1v1/2v2 set (each clan puts in their 5 picks) You need to vote for atleast one map from each ladder & remaining 2 are your own choice.
TG set (each clan puts in their 10 picks) You need to vote for atleast 2 maps from each ladder.. remaining 4 are your own choice.
Then either you keep 3 vetos per side or you have 2 vetos + an immunity for a home map (if cb teams feel their main maps can be veto'd away too easily in the TG set.)
Pradeep, majority rules. If most people want more than just Castle Blood maps, then you need to respect their decisions. Its not like its a bad decision either. TIW has been the most successful CS tournament in the past several years. So why must you keep complaining?
I understand what people are saying in relation to the size of the map pools and most of that has been down to a number of maps having the same amount of votes. To avoid this along with then potentially making the map pools smaller along with getting the most popular picks of each clan in the map pool. How about if i run a voting system whereby each clan gives there map votes in order of preference and i put a point system in place accordingly. Example based on 10 votes for 3v3/4v4, 5 votes for 2v2, 5 votes for 1v1:
So basically the maps with the most points get voted in, so if you have a particular prefrence in certain maps then you have a much better chance of getting them in by making them your number 1 picks. Personally i like big map pools but im open to making them smaller though naturally if we do make the map pools smaller then we need to reduce the vetos.
1v1/2v2 set (each clan puts in their 5 picks) You need to vote for atleast one map from each ladder & remaining 2 are your own choice.
TG set (each clan puts in their 10 picks) You need to vote for atleast 2 maps from each ladder.. remaining 4 are your own choice.
Then either you keep 3 vetos per side or you have 2 vetos + an immunity for a home map (if cb teams feel their main maps can be veto'd away too easily in the TG set.)
YOU **** SEAN 11
I VOTE TO CANCEL TIW !
NEED MORE PLAYERS VOTE THAN PARTICIPATERS? TELL PLZ.
YOU **** SEAN 11
I VOTE TO CANCEL TIW !
NEED MORE PLAYERS VOTE THAN PARTICIPATERS? TELL PLZ.
read my Signature
3v3/4v4:
1. CBA - 10 points
2. CBA Hero - 9 points
3. Graves - 8 points
4. Europe - 7 points
5. Smosh - 6 points
6. Woa - 5 points
7. RCB - 4 points
8. Lustful - 3 points
9. Gwars - 2 points
10. Radical - 1 point
2v2:
1. Desert - 5 points
2. Archer Blood - 4 points
3. CBA - 3 points
4. Dome - 2 points
5. Soldier Store - 1 point
1v1:
1. CBA Hero - 5 points
2. Dodgeball - 4 points
3. Smosh - 3 points
4. Nova - 2 points
5. Hero fest - 1 points
So basically the maps with the most points get voted in, so if you have a particular prefrence in certain maps then you have a much better chance of getting them in by making them your number 1 picks. Personally i like big map pools but im open to making them smaller though naturally if we do make the map pools smaller then we need to reduce the vetos.
Alot of trolling lets get back on track