Community Forums > Voobly General > Tournament Archive > TIW 2020 Rules/Settings (discussion)

TIW 2020 Rules/Settings (discussion)

 [Me_]Zanchy____


Join Date: 30 November 2012
Posts:2595
Posted 11 February 2020 - 11:42 am
Ya it's a mess right now, I'm missing 4 badges :p
What are player premiums? Jason I don't understand
Link | Reply | Quote
 [I3acI]_Army1_


Join Date: 2 July 2007
Posts:3332
Posted 11 February 2020 - 11:49 am
Must be trolling on the premiums. Clue being gold names in lobby lol
Link | Reply | Quote
 [Me_]Zanchy____


Join Date: 30 November 2012
Posts:2595
Posted 11 February 2020 - 1:38 pm
Oh, no nvm, I thought you team premium = premium for all players
Link | Reply | Quote
 Nayl4


Join Date: 25 January 2012
Posts:100
Posted 11 February 2020 - 2:11 pm
Alright im clearly in the minority on this issue, cant wait for 300 to show up and not waste anyones time at all! GL !

Yes. We want to be inclusive.. whatever the consequences are, they are much bigger if we are inconclusive
Link | Reply | Quote
 [ViCiouS]Marauder


Join Date: 19 December 2009
Posts:4071
Edited 11 February 2020 - 5:07 pm by [ViCiouS]Marauder
I might still have the psd files for the old TIW badges I made. I'll check on my computer once I get home from work.

As far as money is concerned, unfortunately I don't think I can get funding from Microsoft since this tournament isn't on DE but I may have a sponsor who is interested in supporting another TIW
Link | Reply | Quote
 [ViCiouS]Marauder


Join Date: 19 December 2009
Posts:4071
Posted 11 February 2020 - 6:20 pm
Just as a follow-up on that post. I'd like to see much better rules regarding time wasting and unsportsmanlike behavior. Obviously we can't cut out the **** talk altogether, but there should never be more than a 10 minute gap between games. Also, the map picks should be fully decided before the set starts IMO, including vetos and immunity.

We usually can't do this with CS tournaments because the players have all the power. But if there's some sort of prize, I think it might shift the power back into the admins hands where it belongs.
Link | Reply | Quote
 [I3acI]_Army1_


Join Date: 2 July 2007
Posts:3332
Edited 11 February 2020 - 6:36 pm by [I3acI]_Army1_
Would be great if we could get a sponsor and i think we should try and embrace this opportunity if possible.

I personally think we should have all map picks and vetos sorted 24 hours before games are scheduled to play, would help everyone involved including myself, players, anyone streaming etc.... We did have an issue previously and that was because some didnt know who would turn up on the day. In addition there is an issue on vetos that is vetos might get used in a random decider. Perhaps we could have it that any remaining vetos can only be used in random deciders?
Link | Reply | Quote
 [ViCiouS]Marauder


Join Date: 19 December 2009
Posts:4071
Posted 11 February 2020 - 6:39 pm
I think even day of the match should be fine. A lot of map picks are based on player availability and you never know when someone isn't gonna show. Just as long as it's done before the set begins
Link | Reply | Quote
 [I3acI]_Army1_


Join Date: 2 July 2007
Posts:3332
Posted 11 February 2020 - 6:45 pm
What about the use of vetos if a map comes up in a random decider that isnt liked?
Link | Reply | Quote
 [Eot_]RedRuM__


Join Date: 11 January 2011
Posts:1820
Edited 11 February 2020 - 6:52 pm by [Eot_]RedRuM__
I think it is clear who will play and who wont. Can we start to schedule the matches? The rules seem clear too. What are we still waiting for?
Link | Reply | Quote
 [Eot_]Trumplaris


Join Date: 1 January 2010
Posts:7517
Posted 11 February 2020 - 6:55 pm
For army to get all map votes to my knowledge
Link | Reply | Quote
 [Me_]Zanchy____


Join Date: 30 November 2012
Posts:2595
Posted 11 February 2020 - 6:58 pm
I think vetos need to be decided on day, unfortunately it's not clear who will actually show up from each clan XD there are alot of diff timezones etc. and player availability is a big thing.
Link | Reply | Quote
 [Eot_]Trumplaris


Join Date: 1 January 2010
Posts:7517
Posted 11 February 2020 - 7:26 pm
If your set is scheduled for 6 pm GMT both teams should have a clan rep in a room at 5 GMT or 530 GMT for map vetoes to speed things along, could be a fair compromise
Link | Reply | Quote
 [I3acI]_Army1_


Join Date: 2 July 2007
Posts:3332
Edited 11 February 2020 - 7:52 pm by [I3acI]_Army1_
Im all in favour for getting vetos all sorted before a set. But im unsure how we approach it if someone wants to use a veto on a random decider? So is everyone happy enough that any vetos remaining can only be used in a random decider? Remember it is one veto for 1v1 or 2v2 and two vetos for 3v3/4v4?
Link | Reply | Quote
 [Eot_]Anonymous821


Join Date: 7 December 2014
Posts:103
Edited 11 February 2020 - 8:04 pm by [Eot_]Anonymous821
Just as a follow-up on that post. I'd like to see much better rules regarding time wasting and unsportsmanlike behavior. Obviously we can't cut out the **** talk altogether, but there should never be more than a 10 minute gap between games. Also, the map picks should be fully decided before the set starts IMO, including vetos and immunity.

We usually can't do this with CS tournaments because the players have all the power. But if there's some sort of prize, I think it might shift the power back into the admins hands where it belongs.
Honestly the main bottle neck here, that RM isn't limited by is spots in CS maps having to be in order.
I think it is clear who will play and who wont. Can we start to schedule the matches? The rules seem clear too. What are we still waiting for?
We're waiting for the map picks to be revealed in a few days


Link | Reply | Quote
«21222324252627282930313233[34]35363738394041
Displaying 496 - 510 out of 611 posts
Forum Jump:
6 User(s) are reading this topic (in the past 30 minutes)
0 members, 6 guests

What's popular right now: